Blogs & News

In an era dominated by smartphones and digital photography, Helena Stark's decision to use disposable cameras at her wedding in Napa, California, seemed like a charming throwback to simpler times. Little did she know, this choice would lead to unexpected outcomes and a memorable twist in her wedding photography journey.

Stark and her husband opted to purchase six Fujifilm disposable cameras from Amazon, intending them to serve as both party favors for their guests and a means to capture candid moments from their intimate wedding ceremony. With around 20 attendees, most of whom were older and presumably familiar with film cameras, Stark anticipated a delightful array of snapshots that would capture the essence of their special day.

"We thought it would be a fun and nostalgic touch," Stark explained, reflecting on her decision. "Plus, it would keep guests engaged without the distraction of smartphones."

The idea, while quaint and sentimental, highlighted a growing trend among couples seeking to reclaim the simplicity and unpredictability of film photography amidst a digital landscape. A YouGov poll underscored this shift, revealing that nearly half of respondents supported banning guest photography at weddings, preferring to leave the task to professionals.

However, Stark's experiment with disposable cameras didn't unfold as planned. After the wedding festivities concluded at her grandmother's home, the couple eagerly sent the six cameras off for development, a process they expected to take a few weeks.

"We chose Walmart for the development, hoping for quality prints," Stark recalled. "But when we finally received the photos and watched the video..."

The video, posted on TikTok under the handle @squish.and.co, documented Stark's reaction as she sifted through the developed photos. What unfolded was a series of images plagued by darkness, rendering most of them nearly indecipherable. Only a handful of photos were salvageable from the 160 that were developed, leaving Stark and her husband stunned and amused in equal measure.

"It was almost comical," Stark admitted, chuckling at the memory. "Some suggested it was a lack of flash, but even those where we used flash turned out oddly tinted."

The disappointment was palpable, particularly for Stark, who had fond memories of using film cameras during her youth. The mishap raised questions about the reliability and quality of disposable cameras in contemporary settings, especially compared to their performance in earlier decades.

"I remember film cameras being more forgiving," Stark mused, reflecting on her experience. "Maybe it's the quality of the film or the development process, but it was definitely not what we expected."

Despite the setback, Stark found solace in the support and shared experiences of others online, many of whom recounted similar challenges with disposable cameras at important events. Their stories provided a sense of camaraderie and reassurance, affirming that such mishaps were not uncommon.

Fortunately, Stark and her husband had the foresight to capture additional photos using digital cameras, a backup plan that proved invaluable in preserving memories of their wedding day. This blend of old and new technology offered a poignant reminder of the evolving nature of photography and the importance of adaptability in capturing life's most cherished moments.

"Honestly, we're grateful for the digital backups," Stark admitted, smiling at the silver lining. "It's a reminder that weddings are about moments, not just perfect pictures."